By Ned Soltz
I
first saw the Panasonic AG-HPX300 camera several weeks before NAB 2009.
I immediately knew that Panasonic had a winner on its hands.

The
HPX300 is a shoulder-mounted P2HD camera with three 1/3" CMOS imagers
(Panasonic calls it 3MOS), full raster 1920x1080, interchangeable
Fujinon lens, flip-out LCD screen, two P2 slots but most significantly
the addition of the AVC-I codec. AVC-I was previously available only on
the $48,000 (plus lens) HPX-3000 or as a $3,100 option for the
HPX-2000. Panasonic delivers AVC-I and more for a list price of $10,700
including lens but excluding battery. Street price runs around $8,495.
I
see this camera as the next step up from the HPX170 or HVX200 cameras.
Like its two more compact siblings, the HPX300 shoots the full range of
DVCPRO HD frame sizes and rates, DVCPRO 50 as well as DVCPRO 25.
Switching from between 1080, 720 or 480 does require a reboot of the
camera, by the way. It's a petty nuisance to me but one with which I'm
prepared to live. AVC-I 100, though, is what sets this camera apart as
totally unique in its price range.
The AVC-I 100 codec is an
I-frame 10-bit 4:2:2 codec and is not to be confused with what
Panasonic calls AVCHD, a more compressed long-GOP codec. Both are based
around H.264. The AVCI-I codec captures tremendously more detail than
DVCPRO HD while utilizing same storage requirements (about 1GB per
minute on your P2 cards). It is computationally more intense,
particularly when editing in Final Cut Pro which needs to transcode it
to ProRes 422 or ProRes 422 HQ. Final Cut Pro running on my MacBook Pro
2.33 GHz machine, for example, cannot reliably play AVC-I 100 ProRes
clips from a single drive; clips play fine from an external 2-drive
RAID.
Unlike the HPX170 and HVX200, which employ pixel shifting
to achieve 1920x1080, the HPX300 shoots a full-raster 1920x1080. This
is made possible with the use of the CMOS imagers. It simply would be
impossible to deliver a full raster camera at this price point using
CCD imagers.
The use of CMOS over CCD presents a set of
challenges that are faced not only by the HPX300 but by all the newer
cameras using CMOS. While it allows for full raster, improves low light
sensitivity and reduces blurring, CMOS cameras in this price range
utilize a rolling shutter. The rolling shutter exposes each pixel
sequentially, which renders the camera susceptible to flash-banding. To
put it quite simply, the duration of the flash or strobe is less than
the duration of the exposure of the full frame. That will result in a
band across the image. While it is quite apparent in the frame below,
it may or may not be acceptable in the moving shot. I have had shots
ruined by flash banding and other shots seem less affected.
Panasonic
is the first manufacturer to attempt to tackle this flash-banding issue
through the release the end of June, 2009 of a Flash Band Compensation
firmware patch for the camera (and, I add, unlike another vendor which
requires cameras to be returned to depot for firmware updates,
Panasonic freely distributes them on the Web and provides idiot-proof
instructions). The FBC firmware creates frames to compensate for the
flash banding and effectively "averages out" the frame. Look at the
identical shot below after applying the FBC firmware updater. And it is
quite apparent when actually viewing the video clip.
Less easy
to solve is the skew endemic to all CMOS cameras as well as the
potential for a "jello-vision" effect. These effects have been
demonstrated but the simple reality here is that a professional isn't
going to shoot bouncing a camera up and down or making a habit of
whip-pans. Pan a CMOS camera slowly, preferably right to left. If in
doubt, consult any film textbook which will assist you in calculating
ratios based upon frame rate and exposure variables. To put it bluntly,
shoot properly and you will not eliminate but certainly minimize these
visual defects.
Many CMOS imagers, both video as well as still,
seem prone to IR contamination, rendering blacks a muddy brown. Under
certain circumstances, it can even happen with CCD chips. My tests as
well as confirming reports I have read on various Web sites seem to
indicate that the HPX300 is far less prone to IR contamination. While
with other cameras, I recommend using an IR filter, I see no need for
one with the HPX300.
The creation of FBC technology, though, is
indicative of Panasonic listening to its customers needs and actively
trying to solve problems. In fact, the HPX300 is about as close to
requests of professional users as any camera could be.
Let me
start with just the look and feel. It looks like the larger pro cameras
many of us are accustomed to using and the controls are all in the same
place. One of my objections to the entire range of small cameras from
all manufacturers is that they just "didn't feel right." Likewise, the
HPX300 can serve as excellent training for operators moving up from
smaller to larger cameras. More about those controls shortly.
The
camera sits comfortably on the shoulder and is properly balanced. It is
far easier to get a steadier hand-held shot with a little weight to
cause inertia than with so many of the smaller cameras that often
require third party contraptions to stabilize them or create shoulder
mounts. Good shooters know that you have to get the camera off the
shoulder and the weight/balance ratio of the HPX300 facilitates those
types of shots. Bottom line, it feels good.
Another professional
feature which I suppose can be considered under form factor is the
integrated wedge mount. Panasonic sells a wedge tripod adapter but the
wedge also fits into the ubiquitous Sony VCT-U14 plate. Sounds to me
like a few ENG shooters got Panasonic's ear on that one.
Now to an overview of some of my favorite controls and features of the camera.
Switches
and dials are big and secure. No hunting for small buttons, and then
pressing the wrong button. When needing to change camera settings
through the menu, the menu button is a rubberized recessed button
toward the front rear of the camera with a dial toggle on the front
left edge of the camera. Both of these can be operated with the left
hand while balancing the camera with the right hand. And there is no
need even to remove your eye from the viewfinder. It might seem small,
but for those of us shooting "other brands" where the menu button is
small and grouped with other buttons in odd place, this is a major
ergonomic victory.
The HPX170 and HVX200 had four channels of
audio, but you really could not access all four. The HPX300 has one
front mike input with level control plus two rear XLR inputs with mike,
mike+phantom power or line level options and a wireless slot-in which
can host the Azden, the Sennheiser or the dual channel Lectrosonics.
You can select between front or rear inputs or assign channel 1+2 or
3+4 to either front or rear or wireless inputs. Thus it is possible for
the first time for a camera in this price range to utilize all four
channels of audio.
The camera is powered by Anton/Bauer
batteries (optional v-mount adapter if you have this type of battery)
with integrated power tap. There is also 4-pin XLR external power
input. Outputs include two SDI, audio (RCA connectors), USB and
FireWire. Note that you cannot stream AVC-I out of FireWire. All other
codes can stream via FireWire. As any professional camera should have,
it has t/c in/out, and genlock in. So this camera would perform
admirably in a multi-cam shoot.
Construction is a die-cast
magnesium/aluminum alloy around a metal chassis. It feels solid. The
only less-than-solid feel that is apparent to me is the plastic
viewfinder adjustment knob which releases the left-right movement of
the viewfinder. It just does not feel secure.
There are other
features that one would not expect on a camera in this price range.
Panasonic has built in Chroma Aberration Compensation, which can be
disabled but not sure why you would. It essentially utilizes an
internal algorithm to minimize CA as it converses with those lenses
that have CAC LUTs in them. I really like the option of displaying a
waveform monitor in the viewfinder or LCD screen. While I personally
find zebras much more useful for setting exposure on the fly,
nonetheless the WFM can be of tremendous help. And yes the camera does
have zebras, two of them to be exact, and they can be se independently.
White
balance can be set using a three position toggle with preset (set in
menu system), channel A and channel B. Channel B defaults to ATW, but
that can be changed in the menu structure or ATW can even be toggled to
by assigning it to one of the three user buttons.
The Fujinon
17:1 lens focuses easily and can toggle between servo/manual zoom as
well as manual to auto exposure, with a button to force auto. Any user
of a pro lens knows this. Those of us "moving up" are hit with a
wonderful surprise. Any 1/3" HD lens should work. One thing that I will
say the HPX170 offers over the 300 is a bit wider focal length. A 1/3"
wide angle lens would run around $6,000 or almost the cost of the
camera. Still those who have purchased 2/3" lenses know this is a
bargain by comparison. Focus assist is enabled from another of those
big rubberized buttons and expands the image adequately.
The HPX300 has four ND settings: clear, 1/4, 1/16, 1/64. That additional ND setting is thoughtful of the Panny engineers.
Like
all of the P2HD cameras, scene files can be created, saved to SD cards,
exchanged, loaded and re-loaded. Panasonic has provided a number of
scene files on the Web site and I would strongly encourage users to
take a look. Those two red Porsches pictured above were shot using the
Cine-G profile from the Web?a little added saturation and stretched
dynamic range.
Again as is the case with all P2HD cameras, under
and overcranking is set in the Scene file menu. That is a bit
cumbersome and I wish that Panasonic would enable frame rate control
via an on-camera dial. Although you could set the same file to each of
the Scene file position and have the difference be the different frame
rates.
P2 has achieved a wide fan club ranging from ENG
videographers to indie filmmakers. It is sturdy, dependable and fast.
Panasonic has reduced prices on P2 and introduced the new E-series at
roughly half the price of the original cards. P2 will always be a more
expensive medium than cameras that can shoot to SD cards or CF
adapters, but at the moment no SDHC card will sustain the data rate
necessary to achieve DVCPRO HD or AVC-I footage.
When I first
read the specs of the camera, I immediately questioned the use of 1/3"
sensors over the 1/2" sensors found in the Sony EX. It would stand to
reason that the larger sensor could produce a more shallow depth of
field and be more light-sensitive. Panasonic maintained that there is
virtually no difference between 1/2" and 1/3". I test using real-world
scenarios, relying less upon charts and more upon actual shooting. I
have to concur that shooting the EX and the HPX300 side by side I see
little net effect of differing sensor sizes. The HPX300 can achieve a
lovely shallow depth of field. I continue to raise it as a concern but
it is perhaps more theoretical than practical.
Who is the target
HPX300 user? This is an ideal ENG and event camera. It is lightweight.
It moves between tripod and handheld with ease. It is easy to shoot and
the learning curve is not in how to use the camera but in how to
control the picture profile settings to achieve the best possible look
for your scenario. You can make it look like video; you can benefit
from Panasonic's natural cinema looks. It can intercut perfectly with
other P2HD cameras making it an ideal B camera for VariCam or
HPX2000/3000 shoots.
The key to the HPX300 is the phrase I seem
to have used quite a few times in describing it: "for the money." You
might want larger imagers, a wider lens, more P2 slots, 2x lens, and a
host of other features. But remember that you can buy this camera for
around $8,495. So, "for the money", my assessment is there is no camera
like it on the market. Thanks, Panasonic, for listening to us and
delivering what so many of us need.
Panasonic AG-HPX300 Camcorder
SCORE: 
PROS:
Form factor. Ergonomics. AVC-I codec. Controls. Lens. Audio. Four levels of ND. Wireless microphone slot.
CONS:
1/3" chips. CMOS imagers can skew. No controls easily located on viewfinder for brightness/contrast.
BOTTOM LINE: An excellent camera for the money.
MSRP: List price of $10,700; street of about $8,495
CONTACT: Panasonic
